To meet the basic criteria of section 1 of the Charter, one must prove the existence of a purpose of sufficient importance to justify the suppression of a right. The concerns must be urgent and real. Moreover, the means used to achieve this objective must be reasonable and the measures must not be arbitrary, unfair or irrational. The Court in this instance ruled that section 8 did not meet the criterion of a rational connection between possession and drug trafficking.
-
- MLA 8TH EDITION
- Beaudoin, Gérald A.. "Oakes Case (R v. Oakes)". The Canadian Encyclopedia, 18 July 2023, Historica Canada. www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/oakes-case. Accessed 02 November 2024.
- Copy
-
- APA 6TH EDITION
- Beaudoin, G. (2023). Oakes Case (R v. Oakes). In The Canadian Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/oakes-case
- Copy
-
- CHICAGO 17TH EDITION
- Beaudoin, Gérald A.. "Oakes Case (R v. Oakes)." The Canadian Encyclopedia. Historica Canada. Article published February 07, 2006; Last Edited July 18, 2023.
- Copy
-
- TURABIAN 8TH EDITION
- The Canadian Encyclopedia, s.v. "Oakes Case (R v. Oakes)," by Gérald A. Beaudoin, Accessed November 02, 2024, https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/oakes-case
- Copy
Thank you for your submission
Our team will be reviewing your submission
and get back to you with any further questions.
Thanks for contributing to The Canadian Encyclopedia.
CloseArticle
Oakes Case (R v. Oakes)
Article by Gérald A. Beaudoin
Published Online February 7, 2006
Last Edited July 18, 2023
In R v. Oakes (1986), David E. Oakes was accused of possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking. The Supreme Court of Canada concluded that section 8
of the Narcotic Control Act runs counter to the presumption of innocence enshrined in section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Section 8 states that if a person is found in possession of a drug, he is presumed to have intended to traffic in it. This constitutes a limitation of rights and freedoms that cannot be justified in a free and democratic society, according to section
1 of the Charter. This judgement is the most important to date by the Supreme Court concerning section 1 of the Charter.